Research Update

In August of 2011 for about a week, my son Peter and I, sequestered ourselves among the 450,000 volumes then housed in the Calvin College library in Grand Rapids, MI, mining the extensive collection for books dealing with pre-critical exegesis and commentary. We completed our research accumulating thousands of pages of notable and obscure authors relating to our topic. For those who have been following my blog and Facebook posts, what you are reading is the beginning of a winnowing work, discovering the theology and apologetic of Reformation era writers relating to inspiration, authority, the work of the Holy Spirit, preservation and how the principium was argued against objectors.

Theological writing, for these men, is a doxological offering. To be true to the Word, Christ must be exalted. As I was once told, “Theology is worshipping God with your entire mind” and so it is with these men. To the modern reader, much of their writings read more like sermons than commentary. Coming to the text as listeners rather than actors, the commentaries contain what is found within the text and not what is imposed upon the text.

At the earliest stages of this reading, there is an undeniable singularity of expression when dealing with the Holy Scriptures among the authors, as other researchers of pre-critical exegesis have already written. These men considered the Original (autographa), the apographa, or copies. The Scriptures are pure and preserved based on the testimony of Scripture itself and Jesus Christ. Scripture is its own authority – it is self-attesting, self-authenticating and self-interpreting. In translation, though the sound and form of the letters change, the sense of the word does not, and, receptor languages are “sanctified” by God to receive the original languages. Thus, a translation can be called the Word of God.

These truths represent the godly heritage of the Church. The witnesses to the evidence, for the Evidentialist are the Scripture itself and the Holy Spirit. The testimony of these two should substantiate for the reader the authenticity of Scripture’s claim. Indeed, to reject this testimony is to reject the word of Christ, Matt. 5:18; John 5:39, 46, etc.

Published by Dr. Peter Van Kleeck, Sr.

Dr. Peter William Van Kleeck, Sr. : B.A., Grand Rapids Baptist College, 1986; M.A.R., Westminster Theological Seminary, 1990; Th.M., Calvin Theological Seminary, 1998; D. Min, Bob Jones University, 2013. Dr. Van Kleeck was formerly the Director of the Institute for Biblical Textual Studies, Grand Rapids, MI, (1990-1994) lecturing, researching and writing in the defense of the Masoretic Hebrew text, Greek Received Text and King James Bible. His published works include, "Fundamentalism’s Folly?: A Bible Version Debate Case Study" (Grand Rapids: Institute for Biblical Textual Studies, 1998); “We have seen the future and we are not in it,” Trinity Review, (Mar. 99); “Andrew Willet (1562-1621: Reformed Interpretation of Scripture,” The Banner of Truth, (Mar. 99); "A Primer for the Public Preaching of the Song of Songs" (Outskirts Press, 2015). Dr. Van Kleeck is the pastor of the Providence Baptist Church in Manassas, VA where he has ministered for the past twenty-one years. He is married to his wife of 43 years, Annette, and has three married sons, one daughter and eighteen grandchildren.

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started