Richard Stock’s (1568/69-1626) Commentary on Malachi and “set prescribed words”

Of the word of the Lord. The circumstance of the person sending, the efficient, and author, as of other prophecies, so of this; he comes not unsent, he spoke not of himself, he came not without the Lord, but from him. So he affirmeth, and truly, to get more reverence, credit, and authority with them.Continue reading “Richard Stock’s (1568/69-1626) Commentary on Malachi and “set prescribed words””

Richard Stock’s (1568/69-1626) Commentary on Malachi and Restraining or Stopping (“to check”) the Wisdom of God to the Church by treating some of inspired and preserved Scripture “needless.”

“There are some who think many things needless to be known and heard, many things not fit to be taught, as before, ver. 6. Besides that was then said, I say, let them see if this be not to check the wisdom of God, who hath both written and preserved the whole to the church;Continue reading “Richard Stock’s (1568/69-1626) Commentary on Malachi and Restraining or Stopping (“to check”) the Wisdom of God to the Church by treating some of inspired and preserved Scripture “needless.””

An Exegetical Grounding: Episode 3

Lecture 3 is part 2 of a study on that much maligned portion of Scripture found in Psalm 12:6-7, the passage we were informed of by Dr. Ward et al, does not teach Scripture’s providential preservation. Indeed, according to contemporary evangelical scholarship no one can find a single scholar who argues that this passage teaches Scripture’sContinue reading “An Exegetical Grounding: Episode 3”

An Exegetical Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text: Episode 1

For the Church to possess such a doctrine there must be a sound exegetical grounding for this element of Systematic Theology and specifically, the Doctrine of Scripture or Bibliology. Since the mid-19th century what was once a robust element of Orthodox Theological formulation and grounding has dwindled even among advocates of the TR and KJV. IfContinue reading “An Exegetical Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text: Episode 1”

Standardsacredtext.com lecture series 2 Starting Tomorrow Evening Tuesday 1/24 @7:30 with Dr. Peter Van Kleeck, Sr., author of “An Exegetical Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text: Toward the Formulation of a Systematic Theology of Providential Preservation.”

Tomorrow evening 1/24 at 7:30pm EST we will begin a 10-week series on the Biblical basis for the theology we call the Providential Preservation of Scripture. For the Church to possess such a doctrine there must be a sound exegetical grounding for this element of Systematic Theology and specifically, the Doctrine of Scripture or Bibliology.Continue reading “Standardsacredtext.com lecture series 2 Starting Tomorrow Evening Tuesday 1/24 @7:30 with Dr. Peter Van Kleeck, Sr., author of “An Exegetical Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text: Toward the Formulation of a Systematic Theology of Providential Preservation.””

Why the Most Recent Critically Based “Better” Version Fails the Church

The most recent critically based “better” version fails the Church because: So let’s say we capitalize the pronouns referring to Deity, add some ilatics, and change the name of God by transliteration and not translation in the new version. Are we to gather because this the “better” version that all other versions in the MVOContinue reading “Why the Most Recent Critically Based “Better” Version Fails the Church”

Is Evangelical Textual Criticism Compatible with the Traditional American Christmas?

Is Evangelical Textual Criticism Compatible with the Traditional American Christmas? The answer must be no, and for the following three reasons: While White pusillanimously failed to answer the question posed by both Dr. Van Kleeck and Dr. Riddle as to whether any portion of Scripture is open to question or change based on manuscript evidence,Continue reading “Is Evangelical Textual Criticism Compatible with the Traditional American Christmas?”

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started